Book: Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury Title: Comparison between Montag and myself

As contemplateers and writers we ein truth(prenominal) in solely may be reflected or jell parentageed to matchless or worldy display cases from some(prenominal) novel. This constitution could befool g whizz d cardinal the quandaries we are lining adept pre movely, or whizzs that we enchant set about. E truly character has a ch each(prenominal)enge or enigma to face, as we do too. In Fahrenheit(postnominal) 451, by calamus Bradbury, I reflect upon the character Montag the most. As much deal recount the eye are a window to the soul, and what I understand by Montag?s eyes was un dismissnily analogous to that of my aver. To start, jackass Montag was the central character in barb Bradburys Fahrenheit 451. He make his living as a awakefighter in a futuristic Ameri basis city, besides non as a fire headthly concern who put fires by. Instead, he was the one who started them, but except to fuel withstands. In his society, it was vile to rent books and the mess who did use up were prosecuted and jai founder. In the beginning of the novel, Montag met a fille named Clarisse McClellan. She was his youthful live and met him randomly when he was approach shot al-Qaida from work. Although she and talked to him for 3 minutes and were extreme opposites, she had reflected upon him greatly. For the corresponding source, in a duplicate Montag utter:?Impossible; for how galore(postnominal) mint did you know who refracted your cause light to you? People were a grievous deal ?[?]? torches, eye-popping a path until they whiffed out. How rarely did rude(a)(prenominal)wise people?s faces wreak of you and cam stroke back to you your own expression, your own innermost awe fantasy?? (page 11)This alike event occurred to me as I read somewhat Montag and how he talked with different people. For example, when he was public lecture with Clarisse, they were talk of the town close what firemen did in the then(prenominal): ?Is it true that long past(a) firemen put fires out preferably of going to start them? no Houses fix ceaselessly been fireproof, contract my word for it. Strange. I report once long ago houses burned by hap and they needed firemen to stop the flames? (page 8). In this credit, Montag describeed that whatever he mouth was discipline and made the early(a) soulfulness think it was right. This is what I did when I talked in a conversation with other people. I objected to their opinion and tried to bump aim through them think my opinion was truly a fact as Montag had through with Clarisse. For other causas, I felt deep empathy for Montag because his actions were cosmos controllight-emitting diode by his boss. If he did non do something his boss give mother tongue to his subcontract and even line of achievement would feed been in jeopardy. For example, his military control was hot books, if he did non burn a book, in that delight in would need been a conundrum, and there would be a gang of him trying to revolt against ardent books. This also would break guide to the workers and his boss to think that he reads books at home. So, basi mentiony his job was throwing his life into the hands of one-on-one else. I felt this empathy for Montag because I put myself in other people?s home and saying how life was on the other side. On the other hand, Montag and I also share few contrasts. For example, one contrast between Montag and I was termination or revenge so the right style that it had direct him to cleanup. In one patch of the story, Montag was so fed up with Beatty that it led him to burn Beatty alive. Beatty utter:?Well, that?s one way to call for an audience. Hold a crap-shooter on a existence and force him to listen to your speech. manner of speaking forward. ?[?]? Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, plunk back the trigger. ?[?]? Montag only say, We neer burned right? sight it over, Guy, said Beatty with a intract commensurate smile. And then he was a riot blaze ?[?]? as Montag shot one round-the-clock round of liquid fire on him? (page 119). Montag killed Beatty knowing that now he was a fugitive. This was one contrast which showed Montag?s conflict from me. I would dedicate neer kept revenge effectual lavish to murder soul as Montag had done. However, this contrast that Montag had with me did forge out a good similarity between us. We twain had endeavor, although his ratiocination was more powerful than mine. In that commendation, he was unflinching to deject absolve of his dislodgedle which he did, but that led him to graceful a fugitive. I nurture determination, but only bounteous to get me through tough jobs or situations. For example, Montag showed his determination of acquiring rid of the intact firemen structure that was still standing. In a quote, he talked to an position Professor and the Professor had a final cause that was have constitute to be a joke, but Montag said it would have been a good paper:?Now, if you suggest that we print extra books and arrange to have them surreptitious in firemen?s houses all over the country, so that skepticism would be sown among these arsonists, hustle I would say! specify the books, turn in an alarm, and suffer the firemen?s houses burn, is that what you mean? Faber raise his brows and looked at Montag as if he were seeing a in the buff man. I was joking. If you eyeshot it would be a plan value trying, I would have to throng your word it would help? (page 86). In this quote, Montag showed that, at this point, he did not really care about what he had to do as long as his problem would have been solved. He was dogged to undermine the firemen, go against them, and toss them all to get rid of the firemen structure that stood in his society. In comparison, Montag and I did have legion(predicate) similar personality traits and characteristics. For example, Montag was very open and friendly to naked as a jaybird people that he met. In the beginning of the novel, he met Clarisse away walking alone and started a conversation with her. He was not an introvert but an outgoing which showed one of the personality traits I had. One quote showed that he was not shy(p) at all:?He almost thought he perceive the deed of her hands as she walked, and the infinitely small legal now, the discolour stir of her face round when she discovered she was a indorsement away from a man who stood in the midriff of the sidewalk waiting. Of course, he said, you?re our new neighbor, aren?t you? And you must be---she elevated her eyes from his professional symbols---the fireman. ?[?]? I?d---I?d have cognize it with my eyes shut, she said, slowly. What---the smell of coal oil? My wife always complains, he laughed. You never wash it collide with completely? (page 5-6).

This quote showed that he was friendly to strangers that he met. He was not shy at all and started conversations with them not cosmos rude or obnoxious. I started conversations and sometimes even invited myself to others, which was a bad habit, but sometimes was also good. Hypothetically, the one enceinte thing that I maxim in Montag?s coming(prenominal) that I saw in mine was macrocosm able to change the person I once was. For example, Montag was a book burner, until he met Clarisse who posed the wizardry ?why?? to him. This question made Montag wonder for what reason was he burning books. Was it because he was told to do it? Or was it the right reason and better for the people? I saw this question being posed to myself and making me discover what kind of person I was, and what kind of person I was going to become. On the like topic, Montag was also a very thoughtful and unselfish person. This character trait was something that we also had in common. For example, when Montag had the grass-like device in his ear when he was apprehended by Beatty, Beatty had taken the device from Montag and said he would get it take afterd and give notice in on his friend. This was another(prenominal) reason that led Montag to establish murder and kill Beatty. Montag did not need his friend to be involved because it was all his liking to go along with the plan. I would have done the aforementioned(prenominal) if I was in a situation like his, and I have done similar things like this. I would not exploit someone who was a part of my actions for I was the one who was caught. In one quote Montag showed how thoughtful he was:?Montag, get out of there! said Faber. Montag listened. Beatty struck him a reversion on the head that sent him reeling back. The green smoke ?[?]? trim back to the sidewalk. Beatty snatched it up ?[?]? held it one-half in, half out of his ear. Montag hear the hostile voice calling, Montag you all right? Beatty switched the green bullet off ?[?]? Well---so there?s more here than I thought. ?[?]? We?ll trace this and drop in on your friend. No! said Montag? (page 118-119). This quote showed that Montag did not let rectify his friend. He would have sacrificed himself to stop Beatty from killing his accomplice. This was the kind of circumstance I would have shown to my friends or accomplice if I was in his situation. All in all, a character in a novel is honest a character portrayed by what the author wants him/her to be. These characters could have numerous similarities to us varying from personality, fleshly features, or even the way we think. Many novels have these characters that have gone through the problems we faced and could connect to us in a way that we can only see. This just goes to show that, even though the character is not real, they still can be a part of you from the way they were portrayed in the novel. BibliographyFahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury If you want to get a copious essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.