Kant And Utilitarianism

KANT AND UTILITARISMPhilosophy s most representative deontological thinker is Immanuel Kant Kant believedthat he had discovered the aboriginal moral right that would determine the appraise fit character of an bodily process without regard to its consequences Kant called his moral law the categorical imperative--a command that holds no matter what the serving . He believed further that the validity of this ethical principle stemmed from reason itself and from our nature as clean-handed , rational moral agents with inherent value . Even often so than we saw above with Aristotle , Kant assesses the moral character of actions by focusing on the internal , particularly the rational formula of human conduct . Kant sees the validity of his ethics as organism so steeped in reason that commentators have noted that his Foundations of the Metaphysics of moral philosophy could have been called Ethics Based on Reason Kant notes that the radix of moral obligation must not be seek in the nature of man or in the circumstances in which he is placed , but sought a priori solely in the concepts of pure reason [ Martin Cohen , 2007 br.24]For an action to be good , Kant believes that it must not simply conform to a moral law , but be d whizz for the involvement of a moral law . In exercise , Kant claims that the to a greater extentover involvement inherently good is a good will , that is , whizz that follows reason s guidance and acts from a sense of duty . A good will chooses what it does simply and purely because it is the right topic to do , not because it is inclined to do or so deed nor because it has positive consequences . Moreover , Kant claims that reason dictates that the principle according to which one is willing , what Kant terms an action s maxim should be able to be a universal law .

As Kant expresses it in his first formulation of the categorical imperative Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the resembling time will that it should become a universal law of nature [ Martin Cohen , 2007 br.35]Analyzing an ethical dilemma takes on a much narrower focus . The only questions : Which actions are inherently good ? instead of engaging in complex projections of the primary and secondary consequences of some act , we focus simply on the deed itself . Does it respect the basic human rights of everyone involved ? Does it avoid deception , coercion and manipulation ? Does it treat people equally and fairlyThe primary hindrance with this approach , however , is its inflexibility . If lying is intrinsically awry(p) , there is no way to justify it even when it produces more good than harm . If we lie or steal in to help someone , for example , a deontological approach lifelessness condemns it . And this standard a difficult one to live by BibliographyMartin Cohen (2007 .101 Ethical Dilemmas New York : The Free press...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .