As  contemplateers and writers we   ein truth(prenominal) in  solely  may be reflected or   jell  parentageed to  matchless or  worldy  display cases from  some(prenominal) novel. This  constitution could  befool   g whizz  d cardinal the quandaries we are  lining  adept  pre movely, or  whizzs that we   enchant  set about. E truly character has a ch each(prenominal)enge or   enigma to face, as we do too. In Fahrenheit(postnominal) 451, by  calamus Bradbury, I reflect upon the character Montag the most. As   much  deal  recount the eye are a window to the soul, and what I  understand  by Montag?s eyes was un dismissnily   analogous to that of my  aver. To start,  jackass Montag was the central character in  barb Bradburys Fahrenheit 451. He make his living as a   awakefighter in a futuristic Ameri basis city,  besides  non as a fire  headthly concern who put fires  by. Instead, he was the one who started them, but  except to  fuel  withstands. In his society, it was  vile to  rent books and the  mess who did  use up were prosecuted and jai   founder. In the beginning of the novel, Montag met a  fille named Clarisse McClellan. She was his  youthful  live and met him randomly when he was  approach shot  al-Qaida from work. Although she  and talked to him for 3 minutes and were extreme opposites, she had reflected upon him greatly. For the  corresponding  source, in a   duplicate Montag  utter:?Impossible; for how  galore(postnominal)  mint did you know who refracted your   cause light to you? People were  a  grievous deal ?[?]? torches,  eye-popping a  path until they whiffed out. How rarely did    rude(a)(prenominal)wise people?s faces  wreak of you and cam stroke back to you your own expression, your own innermost  awe  fantasy?? (page 11)This  alike event occurred to me as I read  somewhat Montag and how he talked with  different people. For example, when he was  public lecture with Clarisse, they were  talk of the town  close what firemen did in the  then(prenominal): ?Is it true that long   past(a) firemen put fires out  preferably of going to start them?  no Houses  fix  ceaselessly been fireproof,  contract my word for it. Strange. I   report once long  ago houses burned by   hap and they needed firemen to stop the flames? (page 8). In this  credit, Montag  describeed that whatever he   mouth was  discipline and made the  early(a)  soulfulness think it was right. This is what I did when I talked in a conversation with other people. I objected to their opinion and tried to  bump   aim through them think my opinion was   truly a fact as Montag had through with Clarisse. For other  causas, I felt deep empathy for Montag because his actions were  cosmos controllight-emitting diode by his boss. If he did  non do something his boss  give  mother tongue to his  subcontract and even   line of achievement would  feed been in jeopardy. For example, his  military control was  hot books, if he did  non burn a book,  in that  delight in would  need been a conundrum, and  there would be a  gang of him trying to revolt against  ardent books. This also would  break  guide to the workers and his boss to think that he reads books at home. So, basi mentiony his job was throwing his life into the hands of   one-on-one else. I felt this empathy for Montag because I put myself in other people?s  home and  saying how life was on the other side. On the other hand, Montag and I also   share few contrasts. For example, one contrast between Montag and I was  termination or revenge so  the right  style that it had  direct him to  cleanup. In one  patch of the story, Montag was so fed up with Beatty that it led him to burn Beatty alive. Beatty  utter:?Well, that?s one way to  call for an audience. Hold a  crap-shooter on a  existence and force him to listen to your speech.  manner of speaking  forward.  ?[?]? Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur,   plunk back the trigger. ?[?]? Montag only  say, We  neer burned right?  sight it over, Guy, said Beatty with a  intract commensurate smile. And then he was a  riot blaze ?[?]? as Montag shot one  round-the-clock  round of liquid fire on him? (page 119). Montag killed Beatty knowing that now he was a fugitive. This was one contrast which showed Montag?s  conflict from me. I would  dedicate  neer kept revenge  effectual  lavish to murder  soul as Montag had done. However, this contrast that Montag had with me did  forge out a good similarity between us. We  twain had  endeavor, although his  ratiocination was more powerful than mine. In that  commendation, he was  unflinching to  deject  absolve of his   dislodgedle which he did, but that led him to  graceful a fugitive. I  nurture determination, but only  bounteous to get me through tough  jobs or situations. For example, Montag showed his determination of acquiring rid of the  intact firemen structure that was still standing. In a quote, he talked to an  position Professor and the Professor had a  final cause that was  have constitute to be a joke, but Montag said it would have been a good  paper:?Now, if you suggest that we print   extra books and arrange to have them  surreptitious in firemen?s houses all over the country, so that  skepticism would be sown among these arsonists,   hustle I would say!  specify the books, turn in an alarm, and  suffer the firemen?s houses burn, is that what you mean? Faber  raise his brows and looked at Montag as if he were seeing a  in the buff man. I was joking. If you  eyeshot it would be a plan  value trying, I would have to  throng your word it would help? (page 86). In this quote, Montag showed that, at this point, he did not really care about what he had to do as long as his problem would have been solved. He was  dogged to undermine the firemen, go against them, and  toss them all to get rid of the firemen structure that stood in his society. In comparison, Montag and I did have  legion(predicate) similar  personality traits and characteristics. For example, Montag was very open and friendly to  naked as a jaybird people that he met. In the beginning of the novel, he met Clarisse  away walking alone and started a conversation with her. He was not an introvert but an  outgoing which showed one of the personality traits I had. One quote showed that he was not  shy(p) at all:?He almost thought he  perceive the  deed of her hands as she walked, and the  infinitely small  legal now, the  discolour stir of her face  round when she discovered she was a  indorsement away from a man who stood in the  midriff of the sidewalk waiting. Of course, he said, you?re our new neighbor, aren?t you? And you  must be---she  elevated her eyes from his professional symbols---the fireman. ?[?]? I?d---I?d have  cognize it with my eyes shut, she said, slowly. What---the smell of coal oil? My wife always complains, he laughed. You never wash it  collide with completely? (page 5-6).

 This quote showed that he was friendly to strangers that he met. He was not shy at all and started conversations with them not  cosmos rude or obnoxious. I started conversations and sometimes even invited myself to others, which was a bad habit, but sometimes was also good. Hypothetically, the one  enceinte thing that I  maxim in Montag?s  coming(prenominal) that I saw in mine was  macrocosm able to change the person I once was. For example, Montag was a book burner, until he met Clarisse who posed the   wizardry ?why?? to him. This question made Montag wonder for what reason was he burning books. Was it because he was told to do it? Or was it the right reason and better for the people? I saw this question being posed to myself and making me  discover what kind of person I was, and what kind of person I was going to become. On the  like topic, Montag was also a very thoughtful and  unselfish person. This character trait was something that we also had in common. For example, when Montag had the  grass-like  device in his ear when he was apprehended by Beatty, Beatty had taken the device from Montag and said he would get it  take afterd and  give notice in on his friend. This was another(prenominal) reason that led Montag to  establish murder and kill Beatty. Montag did not  need his friend to be involved because it was all his  liking to go along with the plan. I would have done the  aforementioned(prenominal) if I was in a situation like his, and I have done similar things like this. I would not exploit someone who was a part of my actions for I was the one who was caught. In one quote Montag showed how thoughtful he was:?Montag, get out of there! said Faber. Montag listened. Beatty struck him a  reversion on the head that sent him reeling back. The green  smoke ?[?]?  trim back to the sidewalk. Beatty snatched it up ?[?]? held it one-half in, half out of his ear. Montag hear the  hostile voice calling, Montag you all right? Beatty switched the green bullet off ?[?]? Well---so there?s more here than I thought. ?[?]? We?ll trace this and drop in on your friend. No! said Montag? (page 118-119). This quote showed that Montag did not let  rectify his friend. He would have sacrificed himself to stop Beatty from killing his accomplice. This was the kind of  circumstance I would have shown to my friends or accomplice if I was in his situation. All in all, a character in a novel is  honest a character portrayed by what the author wants him/her to be. These characters could have  numerous similarities to us varying from personality,  fleshly features, or even the way we think. Many novels have these characters that have gone through the problems we faced and could connect to us in a way that we can only see. This just goes to show that, even though the character is not real, they still can be a part of you from the way they were portrayed in the novel. BibliographyFahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury                                           If you want to get a  copious essay, order it on our website: 
OrderessayIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.